Getting value from online dating celestial dating standards
We can use the information that tells us who individuals choose to communicate with to determine what X would have to be in order to make a woman/man prefer the less attractive person.Researchers have done this* and find that for men there is no amount of income that the woman in the bottom ten percent in terms of appearance can earn to make men prefer her over women in the top 10 percent.Really what we want to do is observe people’s choices directly which is why dating websites are so useful to us. What if I have a hypothesis that when choosing a mate, men care more about their potential partner’s appearance than her income and women care more about her potential partner’s income than his appearance. A woman/man can choose between communicating with two people.One earns ,000 a year and is more attractive than 9 out of 10 people on the market.I have found attractive, educated, dynamic, amazing people through online dating in major cities in five different countries around the world.I am constantly amazed with the quality of people that I meet through online dating.Economists love online dating websites, not to find the love of their lives (although they might be doing that) but because they provide an opportunity to observe a fascinating market in action: the market for marriage.From this market we can determine what individual preferences are for a mate, and this can be extremely useful in economic analysis.
The biggest benefits of online dating, as I see them, are: – The more targeted matchmaking algorithms that help you connect with likeminded/aligned/compatible people – Access to far more potential romantic interests in a much smaller window of time (efficiency and volume) – Multiple levels of communication to allow you to ease into conversations with varying degrees of commitment while avoiding embarrassing situations (viewing 50 people in an evening with online dating? Approaching 50 attractive strangers in a bar/dinner party?
The problem with this approach is that people either lack self-awareness or tend to not to be very honest in their answers.
This doesn’t just apply to the question of race but about other characteristics as well.
If this was the case, then at the close of the market smaller-breasted women only have an option to choose shorter men.
It is a silly example but it does demonstrate the point that we can’t tell much about preferences for a mate simply by observing people who are already matched.This says that despite the impression that on the marriage market women really care about income, the evidence suggest that they also care about looks. I know what you are thinking: that there is more to finding a partner than looks and income.